The Confederate king of battle : a comparison of the field artillery corps of the Army of Northern Virginia and the Army of Tennessee /

This thesis compares and contrasts the field artillery corps of the Army of Northern Virginia and the Army of Tennessee. The purpose is to determine which field artillery corps was more effective on the battlefield and why. To answer this question several areas will be examined. The foundation of ea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full text (MCPHS users only)
Main Author: Daniels, William J.
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: San Francisco : Golden Springs Publishing, 2014
Subjects:
Local Note:ProQuest Ebook Central
Description
Summary:This thesis compares and contrasts the field artillery corps of the Army of Northern Virginia and the Army of Tennessee. The purpose is to determine which field artillery corps was more effective on the battlefield and why. To answer this question several areas will be examined. The foundation of each army and its field artillery corps is one of these areas. The foundation includes militia forces, strength, recruiting, and governmental roles in the foundation of each army. The senior leadership of each army and its relationship with the Confederate government will be reviewed. Ordnance, equipment, logistics, and training of each army's field artillery corps are other areas that will be addressed. Finally, artillery leadership, organization, and tactics of each field artillery corps will be examined.
Item Description:"Text originally published in 2008 under the same title"--Copyright page.
Physical Description:1 online resource (108 pages)
Bibliography:Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN:9781782894292
1782894292
Source of Description, Etc. Note:Print version record.