Argumentation in the newsroom /
The news we see daily is selected from among alternatives by journalists. Argumentation in the Newsroom uses ethnographic data from Swiss television and print newsrooms, to shed light on how journalists make decisions regarding the selection and presentation of news items in their daily professional...
Saved in:
| Online Access: |
Full text (MCPHS users only) |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Amsterdam ; Philadelphia :
John Benjamins Publishing Company,
2017
|
| Series: | Argumentation in context ;
v. 13. |
| Subjects: | |
| Local Note: | ProQuest Ebook Central |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | in00000194663 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr ||||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 170913s2017 ne a ob 001 0 eng | ||
| 005 | 20240702201120.5 | ||
| 010 | |a 2017043997 | ||
| 020 | |a 9789027264794 |q (electronic book) | ||
| 020 | |a 9027264791 |q (electronic book) | ||
| 020 | |z 9789027211309 |q (hardcover |q alkaline paper) | ||
| 029 | 1 | |a AU@ |b 000060758804 | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1003854966 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)on1003854966 | ||
| 040 | |a DLC |b eng |e rda |e pn |c DLC |d OCLCF |d YDX |d OCLCO |d N$T |d EBLCP |d YDX |d OCLCO |d UAB |d OCLCA |d OCLCQ |d INT |d OCLCQ |d U3W |d LVT |d OCLCQ |d UKAHL |d OCLCQ |d K6U |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCL |d SFB |d SXB |d OCLCO | ||
| 042 | |a pcc | ||
| 050 | 1 | 4 | |a P301.5.P47 |b Z35 2017 |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAN |x 005000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a LAN |x 015000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a REF |x 026000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 082 | 0 | 0 | |a 808.06/607 |2 23 |
| 100 | 1 | |a Zampa, Marta, |e author. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Argumentation in the newsroom / |c Marta Zampa, Zurich University of Applied Sciences. |
| 264 | 1 | |a Amsterdam ; |a Philadelphia : |b John Benjamins Publishing Company, |c [2017] | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (xviii, 211 pages) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Argumentation in context (AIC) ; |v volume 13 | |
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a Intro -- Argumentation in the Newsroom -- Editorial page -- Title page -- LCC data -- Epigraph -- Table of contents -- List of figures -- List of tables -- Acknowledgements -- Acknowledgements -- 1. Newsmaking as an argumentative context -- 1.1 Newsroom decision-making -- 2. Newsmaking -- 2.1 Discourse analysis -- 2.2 Sociology -- 2.2.1 The gatekeeping theory -- 2.2.2 Newsmaking as routine work -- 2.3 Media linguistics -- 3. Argumentation theory -- 3.1 An overview of the discipline -- 3.2 Extended Pragma-Dialectics -- 3.3 On endoxa and enthymemes -- 3.4 The Argumentum Model of Topics -- 4. News values -- 4.1 News values: What we already know, and what still needs to be ascertained -- 4.2 News values as endoxa of newsmaking: A working hypothesis -- 5. Context -- 5.1 Studies on the context of argumentative practices -- 5.1.1 The pragma-dialectical notion of the activity type -- 5.1.2 The model of communication context -- 5.2 The argumentative dimension of activity types -- 5.3 The Swiss media landscape -- 5.3.1 The interaction field SRG SSR -- 5.3.1.1 Tagesschau -- 5.3.1.2 10vor10 -- 5.3.1.3 Téléjournal -- 5.3.2 The interaction field Corriere del Ticino -- 6. Building a corpus -- 6.1 Progression Analysis -- 6.2 Corpus and data collection -- 6.3 Selecting cases for an argumentative analysis of newsroom practices: a rationale -- 6.3.1 Cases selected -- and now what? -- 7. Case studies -- 7.1 The editorial conference -- 7.1.1 Deliberative argumentative discussions in editorial conferences -- 7.1.2 Evaluative argumentative discussions in editorial conferences -- 7.1.3 Differences related to the medium -- 7.1.4 Broadcasting an item on a possible snowfall: The SNOW case -- 7.1.4.1 Should we broadcast an item on snow? -- 7.1.4.2 Subordinated issues -- 7.1.5 Choosing the front-page picture news: the LITF case. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 7.1.6 Evaluating choices in a previous issue: the MALI case -- 7.1.7 Criticizing an established practice: the FORM case -- 7.2 The cutter-journalist discussion -- 7.2.1 Plane crash in Indonesia: the YOGI case -- 7.2.1.1 Who filmed the accident? -- 7.2.1.2 Are we allowed to say that this video was shot by a passenger? -- 7.2.1.3 Is the text "at risk of his life he switched on the camera" a journalistically adequate account of the event? -- 7.2.1.4 Is this video allowed by Téléjournal? -- 7.3 Collective decision-making and evaluation: What did we find out? -- 8. Case studies -- 8.1 Arguing with oneself in the literature -- 8.2 Annual results of BPS Suisse and UBS: the BANK case -- 8.2.1 Formulating a good title -- 8.2.2 Numbers are at the core of financial news -- 8.3 Irony as a means to convey a message indirectly: the RUMS case -- 8.4 Individual decision-making and evaluation: what did we find out? -- 9. Case studies -- 9.1 Editorials -- 9.2 Commenting on a speech by David Cameron: the CAME case -- 9.2.1 Cameron's argumentation -- 9.2.2 The journalist's argumentation -- 9.2.3 The journalist's reflection on his writing choices -- 9.2.3.1 The journalist arguing with himself -- live -- 9.3 Writing an editorial on a confused event: the RAID case -- 9.3.1 Israel seems to be best prepared to face a collapse of Al-Assad's regime -- 9.3.2 There is also a humanitarian red alert -- 9.3.3 The journalist's reflection on his writing choices -- 9.4 News products: what did we find out? -- 10. Findings and conclusions -- 10.1 Empirical findings -- 10.2 Results of the analysis -- 10.2.1 Rethinking gatekeeping and news values -- 10.2.2 Theoretical outcomes for argumentation theory -- 10.2.3 Newsmakers as an argumentative community -- 10.3 Coda: possible future development of the research -- 10.3.1 Designing argumentation in the newsroom. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 10.3.2 Integrating argumentation in journalistic training -- References -- Subject index. | |
| 520 | |a The news we see daily is selected from among alternatives by journalists. Argumentation in the Newsroom uses ethnographic data from Swiss television and print newsrooms, to shed light on how journalists make decisions regarding the selection and presentation of news items in their daily professional practice. | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on December 01, 2017). | |
| 590 | |a ProQuest Ebook Central |b Ebook Central Academic Complete | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Persuasion (Rhetoric) | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Journalism |x Language. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Mass media and language. | |
| 758 | |i has work: |a Argumentation in the newsroom (Text) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCFJk6TcmgYwF96k4Tk3gBq |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork | ||
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |a Zampa, Marta. |t Argumentation in the newsroom. |d Amsterdam ; Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company, [2017] |z 9789027211309 |w (DLC) 2017036948 |
| 830 | 0 | |a Argumentation in context ; |v v. 13. | |
| 852 | |b E-Collections |h ProQuest | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/mcphs/detail.action?docID=5155784 |z Full text (MCPHS users only) |t 0 |
| 938 | |a Askews and Holts Library Services |b ASKH |n AH33059597 | ||
| 938 | |a ProQuest Ebook Central |b EBLB |n EBL5155784 | ||
| 938 | |a EBSCOhost |b EBSC |n 1636437 | ||
| 938 | |a YBP Library Services |b YANK |n 15001881 | ||
| 947 | |a FLO |x pq-ebc-base | ||
| 999 | f | f | |s 7122c361-8f29-4394-9bdf-bba65737e9ce |i 4f2498de-65e5-4f1d-9af4-03f193cedde2 |t 0 |
| 952 | f | f | |a Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences |b Online |c Online |d E-Collections |t 0 |e ProQuest |h Other scheme |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |t 0 |u https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/mcphs/detail.action?docID=5155784 |y Full text (MCPHS users only) |
