Is Rational Choice Theory All of Social Science?

Advocates of rational choice theory in political science have been perceived by their critics as attempting to establish an intellectual hegemony in contemporary social science, to the detriment of alternative methods of research. The debate has gained a nonacademic audience, hitting the pages of th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Full text (MCPHS users only)
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: University of Michigan Press 2009
Subjects:
Local Note:ProQuest Ebook Central

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a2200000u 4500
001 in00000219431
006 m o d
007 cr un|---uuuuu
008 121224s2009 xx o 000 0 eng d
005 20240702204916.1
019 |a 743199603  |a 816360589  |a 824156144  |a 1162415775 
020 |a 1282444700 
020 |a 9781282444706 
020 |a 9780472024858 
020 |a 047202485X 
020 |a 9786612444708 
020 |a 6612444703 
029 1 |a DEBBG  |b BV044114917 
029 1 |a DEBSZ  |b 449818659 
035 |a (OCoLC)824100080  |z (OCoLC)743199603  |z (OCoLC)816360589  |z (OCoLC)824156144  |z (OCoLC)1162415775 
035 |a (OCoLC)ocn824100080 
040 |a IDEBK  |b eng  |e pn  |c IDEBK  |d EBLCP  |d OCLCQ  |d DEBSZ  |d OCLCQ  |d MERUC  |d ZCU  |d ICG  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCF  |d AU@  |d OCLCQ  |d DKC  |d OCLCQ  |d SNU  |d VLY  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d OCLCL 
050 4 |a HM495 
072 7 |a JBA, JPHL  |2 bicssc 
082 0 4 |a 301.01 
245 0 0 |a Is Rational Choice Theory All of Social Science? 
260 |b University of Michigan Press  |c 2009. 
300 |a 1 online resource (336 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
505 0 |a Preface; Acknowledgments; Part I. Foils and Stories; 1. Three Approaches to Foils; 1.1. Rational Choice Theory and Its Foils; 1.2. Social Scientific Theories and Their Foils; 1.3. Foils in the Academy; 1.4. My Hope for This Book; 2. Three Types of Stories; 2.1. Deep Stories; 2.2. Exemplar Theorists; 2.3. Ideal Types; 2.4. The Rational Reconstruction of Research Programs; 2.5. The Trouble with Stories: Thin and Thick Research Communities; 2.6. Typologies and Genealogies; Part II. The Rationalist Challenge; 3. Rational/Social Choice Theory; 3.1. Thin and Thick Rationalists. 
505 8 |a 3.2. Rationalist Ontology3.3. Rationalist Methodology; 4. Rationalism and Hegemony; 4.1. Why Rationalist Social Science Tends toward Hegemony; 4.2. The Result: Theoretical Synthesis and Empirical Conciliation; 4.3. Countertendencies: How Rationalist Social Science Defines Its Baselines and Boundaries; 4.4. Countertendencies: Why Rationalist Social Science Lowers Its Positivistic Pretensions; 4.5. Modest Rational Choice Theory; Part III. The Alternatives to Rationalist Hegemony; 5. Cultural/Interpretive Theory; 5.1. Thin and Thick Culturalists; 5.2. Culturalist Ontology. 
505 8 |a 5.3. Culturalist Methodology5.4. Culturalist Lacunae; 6. Structural/Institutional Theory; 6.1. Thin and Thick Structuralists; 6.2. Structuralist Ontology; 6.3. Structuralist Methodology; 6.4. Structuralist Lacunae; Part IV. The Debate about the Debate; 7. The Need for Synthesis: Structure and Action; 7.1. For Synthesis; 7.2. Types of Syntheses; 7.3. Structure/Institution and Action/Process; 7.4. Methodological Synthesis: The Causal and the Interpretive; 7.5. The Importance of Synthesis; 8. The Need for Analysis: Models and Foils; 8.1. For Models and Foils; 8.2. Against Synthesis. 
505 8 |a 8.3. Conclusion: Synthesis and AnalysisPart V. The Philosophy of Science; 9. The General and the Particular; 9.1. The Research Programs; 9.2. Weber's Approach; 9.3. The General and the Particular in the Social Sciences; 10. Models and Foils: A Modest Philosophy of Science for Social Science; 10.1. Theory; 10.2. Evidence; 10.3. Theory and Evidence; 10.4. Evaluation; 10.5. How a Modest Rationalist Evaluates Theory and Evidence; Notes; References; Index. 
520 |a Advocates of rational choice theory in political science have been perceived by their critics as attempting to establish an intellectual hegemony in contemporary social science, to the detriment of alternative methods of research. The debate has gained a nonacademic audience, hitting the pages of the New York Times and the New Republic. In the academy, the antagonists have expressed their views in books, journal articles, and at professional conferences. Mark I. Lichbach addresses the question of the place of rational choice theory in the social sciences in general and in political science in particular. He presents a typology of the antagonists as either rationalist, culturalist, or structuralist and offers an insightful examination of the debate. He reveals that the rationalist bid for hegemony and synthesis is rooted in the weaknesses, not the strengths, of rationalist thought. He concludes that the various theoretical camps are unlikely to accept the claimed superiority of the rationalist approach but that this opposition is of value in itself to the social sciences, which requires multiple perspectives to remain healthy. With its penetrating examination of the assumptions and basic arguments of each of the sides to this debate, this book cuts through the partisan rhetoric and provides an essential roadmap for the future of the discipline. Mark I. Lichbach is Professor of Government and Politics, University of Maryland. 
546 |a English. 
590 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b Ebook Central Academic Complete 
650 0 |a Rational choice theory. 
650 0 |a Social choice. 
720 |a Lichbach, Mark I. 
758 |i has work:  |a Is rational choice theory all of social science? (Text)  |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGPwFXTwF7fMq4xm4hM49C  |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork 
776 |z 0-472-06819-9 
852 |b E-Collections  |h ProQuest 
856 4 0 |u https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/mcphs/detail.action?docID=3414583  |z Full text (MCPHS users only)  |t 0 
938 |a ProQuest Ebook Central  |b EBLB  |n EBL3414583 
938 |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection  |b IDEB  |n 244470 
947 |a FLO  |x pq-ebc-base 
999 f f |s ad2871f1-69ed-4a5f-ab04-d8cf59355dbd  |i af8ea29d-442e-4f24-95e5-025cdbb6d499  |t 0 
952 f f |a Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences  |b Online  |c Online  |d E-Collections  |t 0  |e ProQuest  |h Other scheme 
856 4 0 |t 0  |u https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/mcphs/detail.action?docID=3414583  |y Full text (MCPHS users only)